{"id":998,"date":"2025-06-14T16:48:28","date_gmt":"2025-06-14T16:48:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/14\/how-close-was-iran-to-a-nuclear-weapon-before-israels-strike-on-tehran\/"},"modified":"2025-06-14T16:48:28","modified_gmt":"2025-06-14T16:48:28","slug":"how-close-was-iran-to-a-nuclear-weapon-before-israels-strike-on-tehran","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/14\/how-close-was-iran-to-a-nuclear-weapon-before-israels-strike-on-tehran\/","title":{"rendered":"How close was Iran to a nuclear weapon before Israel\u2019s strike on Tehran?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"speakable\">Israel&#8217;s airstrikes on Tehran, Iran, on Friday morning marked a dramatic escalation in the proxy war between the two regional rivals, reigniting one of the most consequential questions in international security: Just how close was Iran to building a nuclear weapon?<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\">While Israeli experts have warned for years that Iran was enriching uranium at a level that put it &#8216;weeks away&#8217; from a nuclear weapon, in recent days, there has been a shift. According to Israeli intelligence sources, Iran was on the verge of assembling a crude nuclear device.<\/p>\n<p>Beni Sabti, an Iran expert at the Institute of National Security Studies, told Fox News Digital the threat was urgent and specific: Tehran was pulling its materials together &#8216;in a secret place near Tehran to make a primitive warhead.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Gregg Roman, executive director of the Middle East Forum, said that since the Trump administration reinitiated nuclear negotiations, Israel had been collecting fresh intelligence that raised alarm bells.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;There were a few things that stood out,&#8217; Roman said, referencing activity at the Times Enrichment facility. &#8216;Iran reactivated an explosives manufacturing line, which could only be used to help that needed nuclear weapon\u2026 efforts to put the fissile material into a shape which could be used for a nuclear weapon \u2013 that was reactivated as well.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Roman added that these developments mirrored work Iran halted in 2003, when it froze its military nuclear program.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Experts believe Iran is&nbsp;<u>enriching uranium to 60%<\/u>, which puts it just below the 90% needed for a nuclear weapon, and have said there is no civilian use for 60% enriched uranium.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>However, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told a Senate worldwide threats hearing in April Iran is not moving toward a nuclear weapon.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The IC [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapon program that he suspended in 2003,&#8217; she said.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The IC continues to monitor closely if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program. In the past year, we&#8217;ve seen an erosion in the decades-long taboo in Iran of discussing nuclear weapons in public, likely emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran&#8217;s decision-making apparatus,&#8217; Gabbard said.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>President Donald Trump on Friday noted he gave Iran a 60-day &#8216;ultimatum&#8217; to make a deal, and Friday was day 61. Nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran were scheduled for this weekend, but whether those talks will carry on as planned remains unclear.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Not everyone is convinced Iran is actively building a bomb. Rosemary Kelanic, a political scientist and nuclear deterrence expert, urged caution about the narrative coming from Israeli officials.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Those in favor of this attack, including Israel, are going to do everything they can to try to make it look like Iran was on precipice of a bomb,&#8217; Kelanic said. &#8216;But we need to be really critical in our thinking.&#8217;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>U.S. intelligence assessments, she noted, have consistently judged that Iran was not pursuing an active weaponization program, even though it possessed enough enriched uranium to build a bomb. &#8216;Iran could have built a bomb back in 2022 if not earlier, and chose not to. That\u2019s the reason that I think they don\u2019t have one now.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>However, Kelanic warned that the Israeli strikes might push Iran to reconsider that restraint.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Their best path forward now, tragically, is to run a crash program and test a nuclear device as soon as they possibly can,&#8217; she said. &#8216;Super risky to do that, but then maybe they can establish some kind of deterrence from Israel.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The competing intelligence narratives reflect deep uncertainty about Iran\u2019s intentions and even more uncertainty about what comes next. While Israel argues that its strikes disrupted a dangerous escalation, critics fear they may have accelerated it.<\/p>\n<p>Kelanic suggested that even if the U.S. and Iran had come to a deal on Tehran\u2019s nuclear program, Israel may still have carried out strikes on Iran.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;They just wouldn&#8217;t trust that Iran would actually give up nuclear weapons, right?&#8217; she said. &#8216;If you think that they truly can never have it, and it&#8217;s an existential threat to Israel, etc, then the only thing you can do is either completely wreck Iran as a functioning state, turn it into a failed state, unable to ever get nuclear weapons.&#8217;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>For now, time will tell whether Israel\u2019s strikes decimate Iran\u2019s nuclear capabilities or the decades-long threat will continue.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Israel&#8217;s airstrikes on Tehran, Iran, on Friday morning marked a dramatic escalation in the proxy war between the two regional rivals, reigniting one of the most consequential questions in international security: Just how close was Iran to building a nuclear weapon? While Israeli experts have warned for years that Iran was enriching uranium at a&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":999,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=998"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/998\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/retrotradingreport.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}